Introduction

We should reorganize the listing of modules in such a way that each category has only one choice per category/subcategory presented initially and everything else is under a tab called "Advanced". This is consistent with the way modules in Slicer should be organized.
We should come up with guidance for developers on how to organize extensions. In some cases it makes sense for them to be in their own category and some cases, individual modules should be spread out to existing categories. Modules derived from extensions should have the extension acronym inside the module name. As a general rule, extension derived modules should be under the "advanced" section of a category so that the top level is not "messed up"

Listing of Modules

Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26
Core Modules: Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed
Informatics: Is something missing?
Registration: Where does Resample belong? Its here, its under converters, its under diffusion. We might want to introduce a resample toplevel category and add some organization about what resample should be used when.
Segmentation: Editor is listed here and under core modules. Is this a good idea?
Quantification: Is anything missing
Diffusion: Interactive seeding should be promoted to the top level of this category
IGT: this is where all the igt extensions should land
Filtering: This category should get reviewed. I think that one each, but with documentation aimed at end users, should be enough.
Surface Models: Is this the best name for this category? We need ICP registration. Its a must.
Converters: Is this where the resampling tools belong? Does the Dicom converter belong here or into the Informatics category or both?
Endoscopy: This one is lonely
Utilities: Should be converted to extensions, I would think. I am not quite sure about the Brains utilities. Perhaps Hans can chime in.
Developers tools: Is there a good reason not to turn this into an extension? Most people will not need this. Should performance test be moved to the testing category?