Slicer3:TranslatingBrandIntoUIDesign
From Slicer Wiki
Revision as of 18:12, 8 October 2009 by Wjp (talk | contribs) (→Design concepts that reinforce the brand)
Home < Slicer3:TranslatingBrandIntoUIDesign
Return to Slicer3 Interface Design and Usability
Contents
General Design Guidelines that Reinforce Slicer's Brand
Core values of the 3D Slicer software and development effort
Software associations:
- Clarity & usability
- Control & Precision
- Information richness
- Interactive & responsive
- Reliable & Trusted
- Easily extensible
- Open source & cross-platform
- Showcase for advanced research
Effort associations:
- Advancing scientific research
- Assisting treatment/therapy
- Established and long-term
Design concepts that reinforce the brand
GUI Appearance:
- Clean white background
- Precise hairline around buttons, icons, menubuttons, and white background.
- Black text labels where reasonable.
- Verdana is the font of choice, if GUI toolkit permits (can compromise on this for usability issues).
- Icon conventions are here
- All icon image data for application GUI can be found in Slicer3/Base/GUI/ImageData. Individual modules may use these icons too, as well as define their own.
- Conventions for icons as menubuttons, radiobuttons and checkbuttons, see here
- Application should have a consistent presentation of checkbuttons and radiobuttons. So either use the custom icons provided in above reference, or use default presentation consistently, application-wide.
- It's very important to acknowledge contributing projects, labs, and funding agencies. Provide a standard space for acknowledgement for any software module within the module.
- Preserve the footprint of space beside Slicer's logo; do not include other logos in the main application GUI.
Compact, readable design:
- Where possible, multiple pop-up interfaces should be avoided; this can lead to clutter.
- Functionality in module interfaces should be clearly and cleanly grouped
- Where possible, group functionality in collapsible frames, so a user can hide unused elements and simplify Slicer's face.
- The highest level of functionality grouping should be visually dominant (e.g. "Input", "Parameters", "Display", "Results"). See Stacked or Tabbed groups.
- All modules should reinforce the same organization.
- Choose a tabbed panel if each subpanel will require scrolling; choose a stacked panel if there would be too many tabs arrayed horizontally.
- Arrange stacked or tabbed subpanels in an order representing workflow, up-to-down, or left-to-right respectively, where appropriate.
- A secondary level of functionality grouping should be more subtle, and visually distinct from the highest level.
- The density of widgets should be carefully considered. Widget packing should provide enough space to maintain readability, yet be compact enough to minimize the need for scrolling.
- All widgets have balloon help on mouse-over for clarity.
- Maintain keyboard shortcuts if possible. Please keep a consolidated list of all keyboard shortcuts as they are defined.
Behavior:
- In general, users should have to CLICK the mouse to trigger a UI event. Try to avoid UI behaviors that trigger on mouse-over, except for balloon help.
- Any pop-up widgets that are designed to withdraw on a MouseLeave event should have a footprint big enough so the user doesn't accidentally exit the widget.
- Good to have message dialogs that have "Message" "Warning" "Error" icon on them (this isn't currently consistently presented).
- All collapsing panels should contain an indicator that communicates that they can be opened/closed.
- The option to minimize/hide chrome and GUI around Slice Viewers is required, so a very minimal data viewer can be presented.
- Commonly implemented mouse-control of window/level/threshold would be ideal, or some variation on this that doesn't interfere with pan & zoom.