Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130212"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* Continuous integration
 
* Continuous integration
 
** Test takes way too long - What about creating a ctest LABEL named "fast" or one named "slow". It would then be easy to run integration tests: <code>ctest -L fast</code> or <code>ctest -LE slow</code>
 
** Test takes way too long - What about creating a ctest LABEL named "fast" or one named "slow". It would then be easy to run integration tests: <code>ctest -L fast</code> or <code>ctest -LE slow</code>
 +
** Python self test are very long. Does it make sens to run them continously. What about one time a week ? During the weekend ?
 +
* Refactor of Python self test
 +
** Duplicated code :( ... => maintenance hell. See third point reported [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2013_Project_Week:SelfTests here].
 
* Re-enable setup windows 32-bit nightly
 
* Re-enable setup windows 32-bit nightly
 +
 
== Conclusion ==
 
== Conclusion ==

Revision as of 20:28, 12 February 2013

Home < Developer Meetings < 20130212

To discuss

  • ITKv4 enabled by default / SimpleITK updated to v0.6.1. See r21688
    • Review list of existing issue (mantis tag: ITKv4)
  • Approach to display log on windows: http://slicer-devel.65872.n3.nabble.com/Windows-command-line-tp4027441p4027524.html
    • Log to file ?
    • Provide an other (application + Launcher) which would be console aware ?
  • Demo AutoRun for CLI modules (Julien, #2940)
  • Continuous integration
    • Test takes way too long - What about creating a ctest LABEL named "fast" or one named "slow". It would then be easy to run integration tests: ctest -L fast or ctest -LE slow
    • Python self test are very long. Does it make sens to run them continously. What about one time a week ? During the weekend ?
  • Refactor of Python self test
    • Duplicated code :( ... => maintenance hell. See third point reported here.
  • Re-enable setup windows 32-bit nightly

Conclusion