Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20121218"
From Slicer Wiki
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
** Need to check for failing tests, ideally with dashboard machines | ** Need to check for failing tests, ideally with dashboard machines | ||
** Still some EMSegmenter build errors to work through on windows (not yet captured in bug reports) | ** Still some EMSegmenter build errors to work through on windows (not yet captured in bug reports) | ||
| − | * Discussion of threading in SimpleITK (leading [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2013_Project_Week:Threaded_SimpleITK_Modules project for SLC]) | + | * Discussion of threading in SimpleITK (leading to creation of [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2013_Project_Week:Threaded_SimpleITK_Modules project for SLC]) |
* Discussion of issues for DICOM breakout session at SLC | * Discussion of issues for DICOM breakout session at SLC | ||
* Discussion of Endoscopy module bugs | * Discussion of Endoscopy module bugs | ||
Latest revision as of 23:07, 18 December 2012
Home < Developer Meetings < 20121218To discuss
- ITKv4 issues:
- http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2114
- http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813 -- Need a volunteer to test the topic referenced here
- Complete list: here
- Force unique MRML node names? (http://na-mic.org/Mantis/view.php?id=2687)
Conclusion
- ITKv4 will need more testing
- Packaging on windows still to be sorted out
- Need to check for failing tests, ideally with dashboard machines
- Still some EMSegmenter build errors to work through on windows (not yet captured in bug reports)
- Discussion of threading in SimpleITK (leading to creation of project for SLC)
- Discussion of issues for DICOM breakout session at SLC
- Discussion of Endoscopy module bugs
