Difference between revisions of "Slicer-3.6-QA"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Documentation-3.6|Return to Slicer 3.6 documentation]]
 
[[Documentation-3.6|Return to Slicer 3.6 documentation]]
  
 +
*This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules and extensions
  
See also the [http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2010_Slicer36_Module_Cull module culling event]
+
*See also the [http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2010_Slicer36_Module_Cull module culling event] at the end of April 2010
  
 
{|class="wikitable" border="1" style="text-align:center"
 
{|class="wikitable" border="1" style="text-align:center"
Line 13: Line 14:
 
   
 
   
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
=Luis Ibanez' score system=
 +
** Gold:  have > 80% coverage,      0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
 +
** Silver: have > 70% coverage, <  10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
 +
** Bronze: have > 60% coverage, <  50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
 +
** Coal:  have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial

Revision as of 17:10, 14 April 2010

Home < Slicer-3.6-QA

Return to Slicer 3.6 documentation

  • This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules and extensions
Slicer 3.6 Quality Assurance
Score Name Documentation Help [1] Acknowledgment [2] Test coverage [3] valgrind errors
Gold my module complete yes and yes yes, yes, yes 80% 0
  1. including link to website documentation
  2. including name of author and of supervisor
  3. in % for non-interactive part

Luis Ibanez' score system

    • Gold: have > 80% coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Silver: have > 70% coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Bronze: have > 60% coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Coal: have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial