Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20121030"
From Slicer Wiki
m (→Conclusion) |
m (→Conclusion) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
** Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ? | ** Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ? | ||
** Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve. | ** Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve. | ||
| − | * Discuss failing test | + | * Discuss failing test [http://slicer.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=3082872&build=45528 py_RSNA2012Quant] |
** Probably be related to the redesigned associated with ROI node | ** Probably be related to the redesigned associated with ROI node | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 30 October 2012
Home < Developer Meetings < 20121030Attendees:
To discuss
- Sync expectation regarding the CLI used to read DICOM
- Discuss how tutorials testing could be improved.
- Discuss failing RSNA tutorial test.
- Mailing List questions
Conclusion
- PETStandardUptakeValueComputation would need to be changed to accommodate new data. Two days before the release, it's not reasonable to change the module.
- Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ?
- Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve.
- Discuss failing test py_RSNA2012Quant
- Probably be related to the redesigned associated with ROI node
