Difference between revisions of "Slicer-3.6-QA"
From Slicer Wiki
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | =Luis Ibanez' | + | =Luis Ibanez' scoring system= |
* Gold: have > 80% of the possible coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | * Gold: have > 80% of the possible coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | ||
* Silver: have > 70% of the possible coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | * Silver: have > 70% of the possible coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | ||
* Bronze: have > 60% of the possible coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | * Bronze: have > 60% of the possible coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | ||
* Coal: have < 10% of the possible coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial | * Coal: have < 10% of the possible coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 14 April 2010
Home < Slicer-3.6-QAReturn to Slicer 3.6 documentation
- This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules and extensions
- See also the module culling event at the end of April 2010
| Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Test coverage [3] | valgrind errors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | my module | complete | yes and yes | yes, yes, yes | 80% | 0 |
Luis Ibanez' scoring system
- Gold: have > 80% of the possible coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Silver: have > 70% of the possible coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Bronze: have > 60% of the possible coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Coal: have < 10% of the possible coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial
