Difference between revisions of "Slicer-3.6-QA"
From Slicer Wiki
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Luis Ibanez' score system= | =Luis Ibanez' score system= | ||
| − | ** Gold: have > 80% coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | + | ** Gold: have > 80% of the possible coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial |
| − | ** Silver: have > 70% coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | + | ** Silver: have > 70% of the possible coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial |
| − | ** Bronze: have > 60% coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial | + | ** Bronze: have > 60% of the possible coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial |
| − | ** Coal: have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial | + | ** Coal: have < 10% of the possible coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial |
Revision as of 17:11, 14 April 2010
Home < Slicer-3.6-QAReturn to Slicer 3.6 documentation
- This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules and extensions
- See also the module culling event at the end of April 2010
| Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Test coverage [3] | valgrind errors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | my module | complete | yes and yes | yes, yes, yes | 80% | 0 |
Luis Ibanez' score system
- Gold: have > 80% of the possible coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Silver: have > 70% of the possible coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Bronze: have > 60% of the possible coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
- Coal: have < 10% of the possible coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial
