Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20140211"
From Slicer Wiki
m (Created page with '== To discuss == == Conclusion ==') |
m |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== To discuss == | == To discuss == | ||
+ | * Version bump to numpy 1.7? Lichen has been working on it (https://github.com/llcmgh/Slicer.git) but says he is doesn't know the solution to the fortran issue (http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=3160). Are there any suggestions? This is the gating factor for the extension he is developing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * integrate [https://github.com/commontk/CTK/pull/437 CTK pull request] so Slicer can be used with BWH PACS. | ||
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Steve: Check if Numpy 1.8 can be built without trouble on unix | ||
+ | * Jc: Integrate his recent work to support building numpy on VS2010 | ||
+ | * Non-linear transform: Alex fixed the issue. Based on Csaba feedback, he gonna integrate into the trunk. | ||
+ | * Volume with Window/Level as scalar range: Nicole will send an email on the list with possible approach | ||
+ | * |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 11 February 2014
Home < Developer Meetings < 20140211To discuss
- Version bump to numpy 1.7? Lichen has been working on it (https://github.com/llcmgh/Slicer.git) but says he is doesn't know the solution to the fortran issue (http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=3160). Are there any suggestions? This is the gating factor for the extension he is developing.
- integrate CTK pull request so Slicer can be used with BWH PACS.
Conclusion
- Steve: Check if Numpy 1.8 can be built without trouble on unix
- Jc: Integrate his recent work to support building numpy on VS2010
- Non-linear transform: Alex fixed the issue. Based on Csaba feedback, he gonna integrate into the trunk.
- Volume with Window/Level as scalar range: Nicole will send an email on the list with possible approach