Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20170328"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
** https://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/request-new-license
 
** https://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/request-new-license
 
** https://spdx.org/licenses/
 
** https://spdx.org/licenses/
** Rational: Then, we could (1) use the qualifier "'License :: OSI Approved :: Slicer License" in python packages (and similar references in other ecosystems), and (2) also [https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-license potentially request] to have the Slicer listed as an option on Github (that said, we need at least a 1000 repos using the license on GitHub ... and we currently have [https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=3D+Slicer+filename%3ALICENSE&type=Code 110 reported]).
+
** Rational: Then, we could
 +
*** (1) use the qualifier "'License :: OSI Approved :: Slicer License" in python packages (and similar references in other ecosystems),
 +
*** and (2) also [https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-license potentially request] to have the Slicer listed as an option on Github (that said, we need at least a 1000 repos using the license on GitHub ... and we currently have [https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=3D+Slicer+filename%3ALICENSE&type=Code 110 reported]).

Revision as of 05:50, 28 March 2017

Home < Developer Meetings < 20170328



To Discuss