Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20140401"
From Slicer Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
** Is improved modularity for new statistics independent? | ** Is improved modularity for new statistics independent? | ||
** Is improve label selection and location independent? require bounding boxes? | ** Is improve label selection and location independent? require bounding boxes? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Conclusion == | ||
| + | * LabelStatistics Module: Makes sense to depend on SimpleITK | ||
| + | * DICOM and SlicerIO: Agreed on having a better integration of DICOM with existing SlicerIO framework | ||
Latest revision as of 18:35, 1 April 2014
Home < Developer Meetings < 20140401To discuss
- Release roadmap
- Using ITK's LabelStatisticsImageFilter via SimpleITK in the LabelStatistics module
- Current multi-pass VTK approach is on the order of 100x slower for certain cases
- Initial Implementation
- Is improved modularity for new statistics independent?
- Is improve label selection and location independent? require bounding boxes?
Conclusion
- LabelStatistics Module: Makes sense to depend on SimpleITK
- DICOM and SlicerIO: Agreed on having a better integration of DICOM with existing SlicerIO framework
