Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130226"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Listing of Modules= | =Listing of Modules= | ||
| − | <gallery widths="400px" perrow=" | + | <gallery widths="400px" perrow="3" caption="Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26"> |
Image:CoreModules-2013-02-21.png| Core Modules: Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed | Image:CoreModules-2013-02-21.png| Core Modules: Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed | ||
Image:Informatics-2013-02-21.png| Informatics: Is something missing? | Image:Informatics-2013-02-21.png| Informatics: Is something missing? | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Image:Quantification-2013-02-21.png|Quantification: Is anything missing | Image:Quantification-2013-02-21.png|Quantification: Is anything missing | ||
Image:Diffusion-2013-02-21.png|Diffusion: Interactive seeding should be promoted to the top level of this category | Image:Diffusion-2013-02-21.png|Diffusion: Interactive seeding should be promoted to the top level of this category | ||
| − | Image:| | + | Image:IGT-2013-02-21.png|IGT: this is where all the igt extensions should land |
| − | Image:| | + | Image:Filtering-2013-02-21.png|Filtering: This category should get reviewed. I think that one each, but with documentation aimed at end users, should be enough. |
| − | Image:| | + | Image:SurfaceModels-2013-02-21.png|Surface Models: Is this the best name for this category? We need ICP registration. Its a must. |
| − | Image:| | + | Image:Converters-2013-02-21.png|Converters: Is this where the resampling tools belong? Does the Dicom converter belong here or into the Informatics category or both? |
Image:| | Image:| | ||
Image:| | Image:| | ||
Image:| | Image:| | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 21 February 2013
Home < Developer Meetings < 20130226Introduction
- We should reorganize the listing of modules in such a way that each category has only one choice per category or subcategory presented initially and everything else is under a tab called "Advanced". This is consistent with the way modules in Slicer should be organized.
- We should come up with guidance how to organize extensions. In some cases it makes sense for them to be in their own category and some cases, individual modules should be spread out to existing categories. Modules derived from extensions should have the extension acronym inside the module name. As a general rule, extension derived modules should be under the "advanced" section of a category so that the top level is not "messed up"
Listing of Modules
- Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26
Core Modules: Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed
Informatics: Is something missing?
Registration: Where does Resample belong? Its here, its under converters, its under diffusion. We might want to introduce a resample toplevel category and add some organization about what resample should be used when.
Segmentation: Editor is listed here and under core modules. Is this a good idea?
Quantification: Is anything missing
Diffusion: Interactive seeding should be promoted to the top level of this category
IGT: this is where all the igt extensions should land
Filtering: This category should get reviewed. I think that one each, but with documentation aimed at end users, should be enough.
Surface Models: Is this the best name for this category? We need ICP registration. Its a must.
Converters: Is this where the resampling tools belong? Does the Dicom converter belong here or into the Informatics category or both?
