Difference between revisions of "Slicer-3.6-QA"
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|style="background:gold"|1Gold||style="width:33%"|my module||complete||yes and yes||yes, yes, yes||80%||0|| |||| | |style="background:gold"|1Gold||style="width:33%"|my module||complete||yes and yes||yes, yes, yes||80%||0|| |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |style="background: | + | |style="background:white"| ||style="width:33%"| || || || || TBF || TBF || author ||| |n/a || |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 23:33, 2 May 2010
Home < Slicer-3.6-QAReturn to Slicer 3.6 documentation
- This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules
- See also the module culling event at the end of April 2010
Contents
Testing Status
Core Modules
Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Current Owner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
?? | Camera | complete | yes, no link | no | Sebastien Barre |
?? | Welcome | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Wendy Plesniak |
?? | Volumes | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Steve Pieper |
?? | Diffusion Editor | complete | yes and yes | no | CF Westin |
?? | Models | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Alex Yarmarkovich |
?? | Measurements | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | Fiducials | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | Data | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Steve Pieper |
?? | Slices | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Jim Miller |
?? | Colors | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | Interactive Editor | complete | no and yes | yes and no | Steve Pieper |
?? | ROI Module | complete | no and yes | no and yes | Alex Yarmarkovich |
?? | Volume Rendering | complete | yes and yes | no and yes | Yanling Liu |
?? | PET/CT Fusion | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | Wendy Plesniak |
Application CLI Modules
Version of 04-29-2010
Slicer 3.6 QA table 2010 04 29
Version of 05-2010
Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Test coverage [3] | valgrind errors | Current Owner | Comments [4] | 3.6 Documentation Name [5] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Gold | my module | complete | yes and yes | yes, yes, yes | 80% | 0 | |||
TBF | TBF | author | |n/a |
- ↑ including link to website documentation
- ↑ including name of author and of supervisor
- ↑ in % for non-interactive part
- ↑ Test coverage percentage determined by: [# lines code covered / total # lines of code (covered and non-covered) *100] of relevant .cxx and .h files
- ↑ http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Documentation-3.6
Testing Partition
Most Slicer modules have a GUI component and a Data Processing component.
Testing GUI components is still a challenge, so we will focus here on testing the Data Processing components. This can be done in most cases by partitioning the module into a GUI section and a Data Processing section, where the second one usually takes the form of a C++ class (although that is not a requirement).
The data processing section can be tested by using standard CTest/CMake mechanisms. Basically by adding ADD_TEST() entries to the CMakeLists.txt file of the module.
Luis Ibanez' scoring system
The following scoring will be applied to the data processing sections of all modules:
Score | Code Coverage | Valgrind Errors | Documentation | Tutorial |
---|---|---|---|---|
1Gold | > 80% | 0 | yes | yes |
2Silver | > 70% | < 10 | yes | yes |
3Bronze | > 60% | < 50 | yes | yes |
4Clay | > 50% | < 100 | yes | yes |
5Coal | < 50% | > 100 | yes | yes |
6Hazard | unknown | unknown | no | no |
The code coverage and Valgrind error must be the ones reported on the Nightly Slicer Dashboard. Anecdotal data is not acceptable.