Difference between revisions of "Slicer3:Developers:Projects:QtSlicer/OpenDiscussions"
From Slicer Wiki
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[[Image:Paraview_layouts_example.jpg|thumb|300px|Screenshot showing some of the capabilities of the flexible layouts in Paraview GUI]] | [[Image:Paraview_layouts_example.jpg|thumb|300px|Screenshot showing some of the capabilities of the flexible layouts in Paraview GUI]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Have 2 Modules open at the same time | ||
+ | ** Motivation: It would be good for the Reporting module if we could access the module as well as the volume module to change how the image displayed in the image while annotating the image at the same time | ||
+ | ** Suggestion: Create a pop up window which can host any module | ||
+ | ** Decision: TBD | ||
+ | ** Result: TBD | ||
+ | ** Note: TBD | ||
=Closed Issues= | =Closed Issues= |
Revision as of 22:45, 4 February 2010
Home < Slicer3:Developers:Projects:QtSlicer < OpenDiscussionsIntroduction
This page gathers discussions about code architecture/implementation/design of the Slicer port to Qt. This page is mainly for developers as it concerns the internal/implementation part of Slicer, discussions about the interface design should be listed on the UIDesign wiki page. User feedbacks should be reported on the Usability wiki page.
- Please add your ideas/comments/remarks/feedback/suggestions/problems/... below.
- Points will be discussed during regular TCon meetings , on the Slicer developer list and/or by email.
- Decisions resulting from discussions should be tracked into the Mantis under the category:
QtGUI
.
Open Issues
|
- Have 2 Modules open at the same time
- Motivation: It would be good for the Reporting module if we could access the module as well as the volume module to change how the image displayed in the image while annotating the image at the same time
- Suggestion: Create a pop up window which can host any module
- Decision: TBD
- Result: TBD
- Note: TBD
Closed Issues
- Module Logic
- Issue: Change qSlicerModuleLogic into vtkSlicerModuleLogic
- Reporter: Alexander Yarmarkovich
- Motivation: A lot of slicer logics already exist, using qSlicerModuleLogic implies to wrap this logics. Why not directly use the vtkSlicerModuleLogic?
- Decision: Talked by email and over the phone during the Tuesday TCon (01/26/10). The suggestion has been accepted.
- Result: The change has been committed on 01/28/10 (r11850, r11852, r11853, r11854)
- Note: While new module logics must derive from vtkSlicerModuleLogic, logics deriving from vtkSlicerLogic are supported for backward compatibility reasons (the core module logics derive from vtkSlicerLogic).